Sign up to our newsletter below.

First name
Last name
Email
Company
Job Title
Industry
We see you're using an obsolete browser. For a better experience when browsing The New Economy, and for a better web, please consider switching to a newer browser. For more information on popular browsers please see browsehappy.com.
Digital editions
Link to digital editions
Link to Digital Symphony
Link to Regenerative Healthcare
Link to Waste Management
Link to SAP
Link to IBM
Link to Ingenuity Lab
Link to Carnival Corporation
Link to The New Economy Awards 2016

  • Sustainable Innovation Forum 2016
  • Cloud Computing Forum 2015
  • World Pension Sumit 2015
  • Broadband World Forum 2015
  • Mobile World Congress

Insights

Nuclear waste will remain a deadly threat for hundreds of thousands of years. Despite having decades of hazardous waste in temporary storage, the world is only now finalising plans for long-term containment

Onkalo aims to solve the 100,000-year problem of nuclear waste storage

Nuclear waste will remain a deadly threat for hundreds of thousands of years. Despite having decades of hazardous waste in temporary storage, the world is only now finalising plans for long-term containment

Huawei wins $11.6m patent battle against Samsung

Huawei Technologies wins $11.6m from Samsung in patent infringement court case
Huawei is definitely the smaller player, but it is currently getting the upper hand over Samsung in the pair's ongoing legal battles

Huawei Technologies wins $11.6m from Samsung in patent infringement court case

On April 6, Chinese phone manufacturer Huawei won $11.6m in damages from South Korean rival Samsung in a patent infringement case. A Chinese court ruled that Samsung had infringed upon Huawei’s intellectual property rights by copying technology from a handheld product called Huawei Device. Three of Samsung’s units, including Samsung China Investment, are now required to contribute to the total damages payment.

The technologies in question are Huawei’s 4G communications technology, its operating systems, and the software that underpins its user interface. Huawei has over 50,000 technological patents and alleged that 20 of Samsung’s products, including the Galaxy S7, were in violation of the rules. Consequently, Huawei claimed that Samsung had made $12.7bn through 30 million sales of these products by the time the case was filed in May 2016.

Huawei is currently suing Samsung both in China’s Shenzhen district and in California for 4G patent infringements

“Over many years, Samsung Electronics has pioneered the development of innovative mobile technologies through continuous investment in R&D to provide consumers with a wide selection of innovative products. We will thoroughly review the court’s decision and decide appropriate responses”, said a Samsung spokesperson. Meanwhile, a Huawei representative said that the decision protected intellectual property rights and would allow the company to make a return on its investments in research and development.

While this particular case has come to an end, the two rivals continue to grapple with each other in multiple courts around the world. Huawei is currently suing Samsung both in China’s Shenzhen district and in California for 4G patent infringements. Meanwhile, Samsung began countersuing in July 2016, also claiming patent infringements relating to six Samsung devices.

Huawei had a shaky week in the run-up to the court win. On April 5, the UK High Court ruled that Huawei must pay a global license fee to California-based patents holder Unwired Planet, or face a sales ban. Still, at a proposed rate of just 0.03 percent, negative publicity was the main effect of the ruling.

Samsung came off decidedly worse on April 6. The court defeat adds to the company’s ongoing woes, which include a high-profile corruption scandal. Samsung has also been struggling in an increasingly competitive marketplace, as regional competitors emerge to challenge its dominance.

Nowadays, it would seem that phone manufacturers are more inclined to sue one another on intellectual property grounds in order to protect their finances. Reputation and brand image are also at stake in such cases, and are arguably even more important. With the April 6 ruling, Huawei has recovered a little in these terms, while Samsung continues to take a bruising.